A Brief Post on “The Post,” And Random Related Ruminations

Just in case you are worried, no, I’m not going to attempt become a film critic. I actually see very few movies, never seeming to have the time or quite enough interest, particularly in what passes for major theatrical releases in 2018. This one, however caught my eye, given the journalistic topic and the fact that it was offered downtown and accompanied by a panel discussion of media and its varied roles.

It’s hard to imagine any of you would be less informed on the topic of current release movies, but just in case you’ve missed it, The Post is a movie, released late last year starring Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks and directed and produced by Stephen Spielberg. It follows the story of what happened at the Washington Post in the days after the New York Times first published the Pentagon Papers, which revealed the U.S. government had lied about the Vietnam War through several administrations.

President Nixon had his Attorney General issue an injunction preventing the publication of the papers. As they awaited a hearing, the Washington Post came into possession of the same files and began publication. The decision to publish in the face of possible prison time was made by Washington Post owner Katherine Graham. Ultimately, the Supreme Court backed the Times and Post saying the first amendment to the Constitution barred the government from “prior restraint.” In effect, it cannot dictate what a paper chooses to publish or not publish.

In the panel discussion that followed, Dr. Michael Martinez of the UT School of Journalism said that James Madison specifically wanted the Constitution to protect the press, given the experience in England, in which the king had controlled the press through removing licenses to publish or giving jail time to those who published what he didn’t approve. Susan Packard, co-founder of Scripps, discussed the difficulties of being female in a male-dominated industry.

Harry Moskos, former editor of the News Sentinel cited cases in which the Sentinel went against a court injunction to publish information. The panel also discussed the chilling impact current legislative efforts have had on the flow of information to the public. You probably know that public records in Tennessee are supposed to be public, right? According to the Tennessee Coalition for Open Government, there are 538 public records exemptions in Tennessee law. Again, for those of you keeping score at home, that’s Five. Hundred. And. Thirty. Eight. situations in which your legislature does not feel you have the right to public records.

The national parallels with the era the movie covered with our current era could not, of course, be ignored. The current daily attacks on the media from the White House along with the constant refrain of “fake news,” has taken a toll on the public perception of the media, which was actually held in high esteem a generation ago.

The impact was even seen in one of the questions posed from the audience, in which an audience member stated the News Sentinel is liberal and, as evidence of the inherent bias of media, he cited journalism graduates who stated they wanted, “to make a difference,” which he interpreted as meaning insert their own bias. Several people answered that “making a difference,” could, more likely, mean pursuing the facts, which is the root of good journalism.

At a local level, we all know some of the issues compounding the public’s right to know: The News Sentinel which once had 119 employees and a generous budget, now has 40 employees and a budget dictated by USA Today. Metro Pulse was closed down by the previous owners of the News Sentinel and the Mercury failed to survive.

These and other variables make for a challenging time in journalism. Can forty people watch the local government as closely as 119? Will a local newspaper owned by a national company be given the latitude to do investigative journalism? And an audience member pointed out the current practice of presenting both sides of an issue when one is factual and the other isn’t, creating a false equivalence.

Local relationships were also discussed in a couple of ways: For one, if the journalist has personal relationships with people who wind up being part of the news, can they report accurately and without bias? Harry Moskos also pointed out that personal relationships between journalists and people in their community made for better reporting, whereas now those contacts may be replaced with quoting from press releases and electronic communication.

So, it was an illuminating movie and conversation. As always, it left me considering the work I do. Without a background in journalism, I’m often searching for guidance regarding the sometimes difficult decisions of what and how to cover downtown news. Rest assured, it’s something I take seriously and attempt to do ethically and with integrity. My work is not without errors of fact and judgement, but the intent will always be good and I appreciate your patience with me while I explore this crazy, modern journalistic terrain.


  1. I thought The Post was not only well done and well played but also well timed. I appreciate your commentary here. I also appreciate a venue to discuss our countries dying art of journalism in lieu of a less fact based “opinionism” we are all far too well accustomed to these days. I’m all for opinions too if they are based in verifiable facts. But just as important, when one makes a mistake or realize they’ve misspoken I expect that person or organization to announce loudly and clearly they did so. But calling the Knoxville News Sentinel ‘liberal’ I find almost humorous. I knew they’d buy then shut down the Metro Pulse just as they did. Sure they waited so they could say what they wanted about it’s ability to stand on it’s own but they killed it still. Why? Because it was a more liberal minded paper. People liked it too. So it had to go. But I digress. I appreciate getting news like this from a humble thoughtful fellow. Especially as it pertains to how we live in our little city but now yeah….as it pertains to how news and current events arise upon our doorsteps. Thank you.

  2. More discussion of the nature of journalism would be a benefit to our society. I’ve seen snarky “liberals” speaking a blatant editorial on some cable news channels, yet call themselves “journalists,” when speaking nothing but their opinion. I’ve seen this on Fox as well, perhaps worse.

    It is confusing to people who have no background in journalism, so they can be expected to shout “fake news!” when the best correction may be to label the verbal essay as “commentary.”

    Sorry I missed the panel discussion.

  3. Since the early ’80s and into today, I’ve been doing freelance reporting for weekly & monthly papers. I, too, lack journalistic training but have picked up what I could, over time. It’s a depressing age we live in, regarding the economic survival rate of newspapers and their ability to do their jobs without constraint. My current editor has as much as admitted she can’t run certain stories, due to fear of advertiser backlash. I’d canceled my sub to the Tennessean, in large part because the paper has indeed become something approaching USA Today Lite, under the Gannett regime. They recently emailed to me an offer to re-up for $9.95 for an entire year; I still prefer to get my central & east TN news from other dedicated sites prizing factual reporting above all else. And, now, SouthComm (the other journalistic elephant in the room) has the Nashville Scene and the Post up for sale. The attrition rate of alt-weeklies is on the rise….the alt-weekly in my own area is also owned by SouthComm and is likewise up for sale.

    Alan, I agree with Ken, in that your blog manages to provide a truly “fair and balanced” look at all things DT Knoxville. You have a singular ability to respect all views while also keeping readers’ discourse on a respectful level…well, most of the time! That’s one of the many reasons I return to your blog, daily. Please don’t change a thing. We need you more than ever. And, thanks for all you do.

  4. Great article and movie! And, so true of what happened in that era of the film (ie, Nixon trying to suppress the truth via orders to his AG, etc.) is too familiar and parallel to our current president giving his AG (Sessions) similar orders and calling it “loyalty” to the president. Trump does not understand that the FBI or DOJ does not work for him, but exists for checks and balances and justice for all Americans. It’s disturbing to see a president demand loyalty even if it means hiding the facts to protect himself. That would be the opposite of democracy.

    And, people who think the News Sentinel is liberal have not been paying attention to the objective reporting. For the most part, they were /are telling both sides (or more) to the story and allowing the reader to decide what is truth. Some people also believe the media reporters are biased because of the questions or tone used when interviewing someone. I have seen the same reporter who sounds like he/she is interrogating someone turn around and ask equally difficult questions to the person or party representing opposite views. That’s not because the reporter changed their view. That’s because it’s their duty to get at least both sides to a story, if not many sides. Then, report it to help the reader or viewer make a more informed decision. Too often today some of the so-called reporting on tv is often influenced by the sponsors. In some cases, it’s actually an advertisement made to look like objective news. That should always be identified with “Commentary” on the air or “Editorial” in the print publications.

    Alan, if you don’t have a background in journalism, you certainly are equipped for it (a natural), and do a much better job of remaining objective (imo) than I do. Kudos!

Speak Your Mind


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.